[ the wording may not make it too obvious, but. this is a text tony sent out to every device with a connection to the network; why he didn't just make a normal update? reasoning lost to the ages. ]
ok 1. more of u know ur gemstone cuts/settings than i wld have thought 2. thx i think i did by that i mean i got five takers & im assuming it belongs 2 @ least 1 of them
only semantically well. technically semantically it does genuinely have a '2 submit a proposal 2 some1' meaning but yeah its p different most ppl wldnt assume that meaning also dont feel 2 bad having that many fiancees n 1 place is just asking 4 trouble anyway
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
@ stacy's moms. mass text.
u might be the one...
who owns this ring. is this urs?
no subject
All kidding aside: it isn't mine. That's a hell of a sentimental thing to have dropped on you. I hope you find who it belongs to.
no subject
2. thx i think i did
by that i mean i got five takers & im assuming it belongs 2 @ least 1 of them
no subject
Five takers? I'm veering between "what four jerks tried to take a ring that wasn't there" and "you got five people to accept your proposal, respect."
no subject
i think?
5 is actually a lower % 4 me in terms of propositioning this many ppl
but i guess proposing is diff
no subject
no subject
well. technically semantically
it does genuinely have a '2 submit a proposal 2 some1' meaning but
yeah its p different most ppl wldnt assume that meaning
also dont feel 2 bad
having that many fiancees n 1 place is just asking 4 trouble anyway
no subject
no subject
i thank clogsmo daily
if i ever get more than 1 @ once tho ill b sure @ let u know so i @ least have someone who can look 4 me after a # of days